Decision of the District Court of North Holland dated November 18, 2020

Translation: Petitioner has experienced strong discomfort with her first names since her early childhood. She does not find her first names appealing and cannot identify with them. Although the names themselves are neutral, she feels a sense of shame when introducing herself with her first names.

In her daily life, the petitioner uses the nickname Annelies* whenever possible. Only a limited number of people in her social circle are aware of her official first names.

Over the years, she has tried to overcome the discomfort around her first names, thinking about how important they really are on diplomas and passports. However, no matter how she tries to come to terms with the name, feelings of discomfort and shame persist, compelling her to change her first names. She has been unable to integrate her official first names into her daily life. She tries to keep the names hidden as much as possible, even playing a significant role in her future wedding.

The petitioner is always the one who books plane tickets for herself and others, just to prevent others from learning about her official first names. She no longer wants to carry these unpleasant experiences. Another factor in the request for a name change is that the petitioner has no connection to the Christian faith. Her official first names give a strong impression of being associated with Christianity, which does not align with her beliefs. She finds the names outdated and not in line with the times. Therefore, the petitioner has chosen specific first names (in addition to the name Annelies) to ensure that her initials remain the same.

Based on the petitioner’s explanation, the court determines that she has a sufficiently compelling reason for the name change request. The court grants the request (in writing).

*The real first name is fictionalized.